FHIR vs X12 837 - Simplifying Claims Data

Flexpa is hosting a webinar on patient consent and payer-to-payer data exchange on March 12th. Join us to learn how the industry is tackling consent management, network connectivity, and data standardization. Save your spot now.

In healthcare, data interoperability has long been challenged by legacy systems. Traditional formats like the X12 EDI 837 Claim transaction were built for efficiency in machine-to-machine communication but come with steep learning curves and hidden complexity. In contrast, modern standards such as FHIR's ExplanationOfBenefit (EOB) offer a developer-friendly, self-describing approach reporting adjudicated claims to patients.

Flexpa leverages these modern standards to transform how organizations access claims and clinical records. Our API provides a single, secure integration to connect with over 300 health plans, converting the complex world of disparate data formats into a streamlined, consistent experience.

Let's dive into the differences between using FHIR's ExplanationOfBenefit (EOB) and an adjudicated X12 EDI 837 Claim transaction.

1. Data Structure & Syntax

FHIR ExplanationOfBenefit

• Format: JSON or XML, making it human-readable.
• Structure: A hierarchical, resource-based model with self-describing fields that clearly indicate relationships between entities.
• Attributes: Uses clear, descriptive names and explicit references, which greatly simplify data navigation.

Example:

{
  "resourceType": "ExplanationOfBenefit",
  "id": "EB3500",
  "status": "active",
  "type": {
    "coding": [
      {
        "system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/claim-type",
        "code": "professional"
      }
    ]
  },
  "use": "claim",
  "patient": { "reference": "Patient/pat1" },
  "created": "2014-08-16",
  "insurer": { "reference": "Organization/3" },
  "provider": {
    "reference": "Practitioner/1"
  },
  "outcome": "complete",
  "item": [
    {
      "sequence": 1,
      "productOrService": {
        "coding": [
          {
            "system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/ex-USCLS",
            "code": "1205"
          }
        ]
      },
      "servicedDate": "2014-08-16",
      "unitPrice": { "value": 135.57, "currency": "USD" },
      "net": { "value": 135.57, "currency": "USD" },
      "encounter": [{ "reference": "Encounter/example" }],
      "adjudication": [
        {
          "category": { "coding": [{ "code": "eligible" }] },
          "amount": { "value": 120.0, "currency": "USD" }
        },
        {
          "category": { "coding": [{ "code": "eligpercent" }] },
          "quantity": { "value": 0.8 }
        },
        {
          "category": { "coding": [{ "code": "benefit" }] },
          "amount": { "value": 96.0, "currency": "USD" }
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "total": [
    {
      "category": { "coding": [{ "code": "submitted" }] },
      "amount": { "value": 135.57, "currency": "USD" }
    }
  ]
}

X12 EDI 837 Claim

• Format: A compact EDI format with fixed-width fields and delimiters.
• Structure: Organized in hierarchical segments and loops, where data is conveyed through numeric codes rather than self-describing elements.
• Attributes: Relies on positional data and translation tables, which makes parsing and interpretation significantly more complex.

Example:

ISA*00*          *00*          *ZZ*SUBMITTERID    *ZZ*RECEIVERID     *220825*1253*^*00501*000000001*0*P*:~
GS*HC*SUBID*RECID*20220825*1253*1*X*005010X222A1~
ST*837*0001*005010X222A1~
BHT*0019*00*0123*20220825*1253*CH~
NM1*41*2*PROVIDER ORGANIZATION*****46*1234567890~
NM1*40*2*RECEIVER NAME*****46*0987654321~
HL*1**20*1~
NM1*85*2*BILLING PROVIDER*****XX*1234567890~
N3*123 MAIN STREET~
N4*ANYTOWN*XX*12345~
REF*EI*123456789~
HL*2*1*22*0~
SBR*P*18*******MC~
NM1*IL*1*DOE*JOHN****MI*12345678901~
N3*456 OAK STREET~
N4*SOMECITY*XX*67890~
DMG*D8*19600101*M~
NM1*PR*2*INSURER NAME*****PI*PAYERID123~
CLM*CLAIMID12345*75***11:B:1*Y*A*Y*Y~
HI*ABK:J20.9~
LX*1~
SV1*HC:99213*75*UN*1***1~
DTP*472*D8*20220820~
SE*22*0001~
GE*1*1~
IEA*1*000000001~

2. Character Encoding & Readability

FHIR ExplanationOfBenefit:

• Supports Unicode (UTF-8), allowing for a broader range of characters and improved internationalization.
• Field names are explicit, which aids in both human debugging and automated processing.

X12 EDI 837 Claim:

• Limited to ASCII (with some extensions), meaning each code must be interpreted using external translation tables.
• Readability is sacrificed for compactness, making it difficult for developers to work directly with the raw data.

3. Processing & Integration

FHIR ExplanationOfBenefit:

• Designed for API-driven workflows using modern protocols like HTTP/REST.
• Its self-contained resource model reduces the need for custom parsing logic (in the best case scenario), accelerating development.

X12 EDI 837 Claim:

• Optimized for batch processing and transaction-based communication methods.
• Requires specialized EDI systems and translation layers, adding complexity and lengthening integration time.

4. Flexpa's Role in Bridging the Gap

Flexpa's API provides FHIR ExplanationOfBenefit resources in a consistent format. This means that instead of building custom parsers for legacy EDI formats, developers can leverage Flexpa's unified interface:

• Unified Data Model: All claims data is received as FHIR resources, reducing integration complexity.
• Modern Developer Experience: RESTful APIs, JSON/XML output, and robust documentation streamline development.
• Patient-Consented Access: Secure digital consent flows ensure data is accessed in compliance with modern privacy standards.

Conclusion

While the X12 837 format was engineered for efficient EDI messaging, its technical complexity creates significant barriers for modern healthcare applications. FHIR's ExplanationOfBenefit, by contrast, is engineered for today's digital ecosystem—facilitating real-time, transparent, and scalable data access. Flexpa's platform abstracts the legacy complexity and empowers developers with a single, secure API that delivers patient-consented claims data in a consistent FHIR R4 format.